HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 542/1/1    most recent 2002.024109v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reuss, L. Articles by Hirst, B. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reuss, L. Articles by Hirst, B. H.

Water transport controversies - an overview

Luis Reuss and Barry H. Hirst *

The last 20 years have seen major advances in the understanding of the mechanisms and molecular bases of water transport across cell membranes. Prominent among these advances was the discovery of a family of transmembrane proteins that permeate exclusively or dominantly water (aquaporins), followed by structural studies identifying the intramolecular permeation pathway, as well as by studies directed to a detailed understanding of these molecules in health and disease. Agre and colleagues (Agre et al. 2002) discuss the molecular structure of aquaporins and the physiology and pathophysiology of aquaporins in diverse organs and tissues. Another important advance was the development of methods for rapid measurements of changes in cell volume. This resulted in accurate estimates of cell-membrane water permeability, and in the prediction that very small osmotic gradients would suffice to drive transepithelial transport, without the need for the existence of compartments of much higher osmolality than that of the bathing solution. Around 1990, faced with the question of what pathways and driving forces underlie net water fluxes across cell membranes, most physiologists working on animal cells would have had direct and clear answers. Water moves across the phospholipid moiety of the plasma membrane (although this membrane can be extremely water-tight in certain cases), and through water pores, in cells that express these proteins. The driving force is the difference in effective osmolality across the cell membrane. Enlightened physiologists working on epithelia would add that transepithelial water absorption or secretion is always a passive phenomenon, secondary to net solute transport in the same direction. Further, complicated compartment models, such as the standing osmotic gradient hypothesis, are unnecessary to explain water transport, because very small osmotic gradients, perhaps too small to measure directly, are a sufficient driving force. The question of how water fluxes are partitioned between transcellular and paracellular pathways remained difficult to answer because of the lack of direct measurements.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Naftalin Osmotic Water Transport with Glucose in GLUT2 and SGLT Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3912 - 3923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M. Charron, M. G. Blanchard, and J.-Y. Lapointe Intracellular Hypertonicity Is Responsible for Water Flux Associated with Na+/Glucose Cotransport Biophys. J., May 15, 2006; 90(10): 3546 - 3554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. V. Remillard and J. X.-J. Yuan Activation of K+ channels: an essential pathway in programmed cell death Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): L49 - L67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Guo, S. D. Hillyard, and B. M. Fu A two-barrier compartment model for volume flow across amphibian skin Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): R1384 - R1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]