|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 The Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research & Training Institute and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
2 Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Recovery from fast inactivation in voltage-dependent Na+ channels is associated with a slow component in the time course of gating charge during repolarization (i.e. charge immobilization), which results from the slow movement of the S4 segments in domains III and IV (S4-DIII and S4-DIV). Previous studies have shown that the non-specific removal of fast inactivation by the proteolytic enzyme pronase eliminated charge immobilization, while the specific removal of fast inactivation (by intracellular MTSET modification of a cysteine substituted for the phenylalanine in the IFM motif, ICMMTSET, in the inactivation particle formed by the linker between domains III and IV) only reduced the amount of charge immobilization by nearly one-half. To investigate the molecular origin of the remaining slow component of charge immobilization we studied the human cardiac Na+ channel (hH1a) in which the outermost arginine in the S4-DIV, which contributes
20% to total gating charge (Qmax), was mutated to a cysteine (R1C-DIV). Gating charge could be fully restored in R1C-DIV by exposure to extracellular MTSEA, a positively charged methanethiosulphonate reagent. The RIC-DIV mutation was combined with ICMMTSET to remove fast inactivation, and the gating currents of R1C-DIV-ICMMTSET were recorded before and after modification with MTSEAo. Prior to MTSEAo, the time course of the gating charge during repolarization (OFF-charge) was best described by a single fast time constant. After MTSEA, the OFF-charge had both fast and slow components, with the slow component accounting for nearly 35% of Qmax. These results demonstrate that the slow movement of the S4-DIV during repolarization is not dependent upon the normal binding of the inactivation particle.
(Received 18 October 2004;
accepted after revision 1 December 2004;
first published online 2 December 2004)
Corresponding author M. F. Sheets: CVRTI, Bldg 500, 95 South 2000 East, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Email: michael{at}cvrti.utah.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Gamal El-Din, D. Grogler, C. Lehmann, H. Heldstab, and N. G. Greeff More Gating Charges are Needed to Open a Shaker K+ Channel than are Needed to Open an rBIIA Na+ Channel Biophys. J., August 1, 2008; 95(3): 1165 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Groome, M. C. Dice, E. Fujimoto, and P. C. Ruben Charge Immobilization of Skeletal Muscle Na+ Channels: Role of Residues in the Inactivation Linker Biophys. J., September 1, 2007; 93(5): 1519 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Sheets and D. A. Hanck Outward stabilization of the S4 segments in domains III and IV enhances lidocaine block of sodium channels J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 317 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhu, J. W. Kyle, and P. J. Lee Flecainide sensitivity of a Na channel long QT mutation shows an open-channel blocking mechanism for use-dependent block Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H29 - H37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |