J Physiol Boston Smyposia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 566, Number 1, 119-124, July 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.090878
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
566/1/119    most recent
jphysiol.2005.090878v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grieve, K. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grieve, K. L

Related Papers

Binocular visual responses in cells of the rat dLGN

Kenneth L Grieve1

1 Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Moffat Building, North Campus, Manchester M60 1QD, UK

In the mammalian visual system the output of the retina reaches the cerebral cortex by means of a synaptic link within the thalamus, the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). In higher mammals this structure is visibly laminated, such that input from the two eyes remains segregated, binocular responses in essence being seen first in the cerebral cortex. In the rat this segregation is less obvious. With only around 3–10% of retinal ganglion cells projecting axons to the ipsilateral dLGN, the dLGN may be considered basically monocular; however, these ipsilaterally projecting axons contact cells in a region described as the ‘hidden lamina’, whose physiological properties have not been well described. In the anatomical literature, there is some debate as to the possibility of cross-over between the terminations of the two eyes. Here, a population of cells physiologically receiving input from the ipsilateral eye is described – surprisingly, the majority (63%) had powerful, excitatory input from both eyes, suggesting a simple form of binocular integration at a stage earlier than previously described for other, more ‘visually developed’ species, in which thalamic binocular integration is complex.

(Received 18 May 2005; accepted after revision 19 May 2005; first published online 19 May 2005)
Corresponding author K. Grieve: Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Moffat Building, North Campus, Manchester M60 1QD, UK. Email: ken.grieve{at}manchester.ac.uk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Ziburkus and W. Guido
Loss of Binocular Responses and Reduced Retinal Convergence During the Period of Retinogeniculate Axon Segregation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2775 - 2784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.